Today we had a very different kind of peer review of our dream cities. It wasn’t a literal commenting over the stories written. It was just the first experience of reading peer dream cities. It included relating the title to the story line. It gave us a rough idea about how vague/direct/literal our stories were.
My work was being reviewed by Sejal. She gave a very honest opinion about my dream cities. She laid emphasis on correcting my mistakes through examples. She also suggested that I should have used simpler language. Which I ‘ll work further on.
Everybody has different perspective over a story line. And it always differs when it comes to opinions of different people over different topics.
It was good to know that she liked the way I imagined my dream city to be. And I will also consider the changes that she suggested and will work on my story accordingly. I have actually got some more easy ideas to expand my storyline by explaining things in depth.
Glorious messđź’• 